Goins v. State

889 So. 2d 918, 2004 WL 3029499
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 10, 2004
Docket2D04-2160
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 889 So. 2d 918 (Goins v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Goins v. State, 889 So. 2d 918, 2004 WL 3029499 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

889 So.2d 918 (2004)

Henry GOINS, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 2D04-2160.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

December 10, 2004.

*919 CASANUEVA, Judge.

Henry Goins appeals the trial court's order denying his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We affirm without prejudice to Goins' right to file, within sixty days of this court's mandate, a motion to withdraw his plea pursuant to rule 3.850.

In his motion, Goins alleged that his sentence was not executed in accordance with the written plea agreement. Goins did not, however, seek to withdraw his plea. Because Goins did not seek the appropriate relief, the trial court correctly denied his motion. See Green v. State, 857 So.2d 304 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003). Accordingly, we affirm the trial court's order without prejudice to Goins' right to file in the trial court, within sixty days of the date of this court's mandate, a motion seeking to withdraw his plea pursuant to rule 3.850. If filed within sixty days, the motion should be considered timely and not deemed successive.

We caution Goins that if he decides to withdraw his plea and not be bound by the plea agreement, the State, too, will not be bound by the plea agreement. See id. at 306. If Goins withdraws his plea, either side may pursue new plea negotiations or refuse them and proceed to trial. If Goins is convicted after trial, he may be sentenced to a longer term of imprisonment than the sentence he presently serves.

Affirmed.

CANADY and VILLANTI, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

JACQUELINE DENISE SMALL v. STATE OF FLORIDA
249 So. 3d 675 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)
Ireland v. State
141 So. 3d 635 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)
Therriault v. Therriault
102 So. 3d 711 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)
Purifoy v. State
10 So. 3d 197 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)
Ciambrone v. State
938 So. 2d 550 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
Cornett v. State
922 So. 2d 297 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
889 So. 2d 918, 2004 WL 3029499, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goins-v-state-fladistctapp-2004.