Goins v. Sanford Furniture Co.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Goins v. Sanford Furniture Co.

412 S.E.2d 172, 105 N.C. App. 244, 1992 N.C. App. LEXIS 19

CourtCourt of Appeals of North Carolina

DecidedJanuary 21, 1992

DocketNo. 9110IC212

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 412 S.E.2d 172 (Goins v. Sanford Furniture Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Goins v. Sanford Furniture Co., 412 S.E.2d 172, 105 N.C. App. 244, 1992 N.C. App. LEXIS 19 (N.C. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

EAGLES, Judge.

The appellants have failed to timely give notice of appeal. “The procedure for appeal from the full Commission shall be as provided in the North Carolina Rules of Appellate Procedure. N.C. Gen. Stat. 97-86.” Fisher v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours, 54 N.C. App. 176, 177, 282 S.E.2d 543 (1981). G.S. 97-86 provides that “either party to the dispute may, within 30 days from the date of [the Commission’s award] or within 30 days after receipt of notice to be sent by registered mail or certified mail of such award, but not thereafter, appeal” to this Court. The record before us here does not indicate whether notice of the award was mailed. We are bound by the record. Fisher, 54 N.C. App. at 177 n. 1, 282 S.E.2d at 543 n. 1. Accordingly, the appellant was required to file notice within thirty days from the date of the award. The full Commission filed its opinion and award on 4 December 1990. The statutorily allotted thirty days expired on 3 January 1991. However, the appellants filed notice of appeal on 4 January 1991, after expiration of the thirty day filing period. The appellants failed to timely perfect their appeal. See Fisher v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours, 54 N.C. App. 176, 282 S.E.2d 543 (1981). In re Appeal from Civil Penalty, 324 N.C. 373, 384, 379 S.E.2d 30, 37 (1989) (one panel of this Court is bound by a prior decision of another panel of this Court addressing the same issue, although in a different case, unless the prior decision has been overturned by a higher court). Because the appellants failed to timely perfect their appeal by giving notice within thirty days of the order, we lack subject matter jurisdiction to resolve this controversy. The appeal must be dismissed.

In any event, after carefully examining the issues raised by the appellant and the arguments proffered in the appellate briefs, we find this appeal to be meritless. Accordingly, we dismiss.

Dismissed.

Judges JOHNSON and Orr concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

EAGLES, Judge.

The appellants have failed to timely give notice of appeal. “The procedure for appeal from the full Commission shall be as provided in the North Carolina Rules of Appellate Procedure. N.C. Gen. Stat. 97-86.” Fisher v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours, 54 N.C. App. 176, 177, 282 S.E.2d 543 (1981). G.S. 97-86 provides that “either party to the dispute may, within 30 days from the date of [the Commission’s award] or within 30 days after receipt of notice to be sent by registered mail or certified mail of such award, but not thereafter, appeal” to this Court. The record before us here does not indicate whether notice of the award was mailed. We are bound by the record. Fisher, 54 N.C. App. at 177 n. 1, 282 S.E.2d at 543 n. 1. Accordingly, the appellant was required to file notice within thirty days from the date of the award. The full Commission filed its opinion and award on 4 December 1990. The statutorily allotted thirty days expired on 3 January 1991. However, the appellants filed notice of appeal on 4 January 1991, after expiration of the thirty day filing period. The appellants failed to timely perfect their appeal. See Fisher v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours, 54 N.C. App. 176, 282 S.E.2d 543 (1981). In re Appeal from Civil Penalty, 324 N.C. 373, 384, 379 S.E.2d 30, 37 (1989) (one panel of this Court is bound by a prior decision of another panel of this Court addressing the same issue, although in a different case, unless the prior decision has been overturned by a higher court). Because the appellants failed to timely perfect their appeal by giving notice within thirty days of the order, we lack subject matter jurisdiction to resolve this controversy. The appeal must be dismissed.

In any event, after carefully examining the issues raised by the appellant and the arguments proffered in the appellate briefs, we find this appeal to be meritless. Accordingly, we dismiss.

Dismissed.

Judges JOHNSON and Orr concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

412 S.E.2d 172, 105 N.C. App. 244, 1992 N.C. App. LEXIS 19, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goins-v-sanford-furniture-co-ncctapp-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack