Goicoechea v. Law Offices of Kihl
This text of 234 A.D.2d 509 (Goicoechea v. Law Offices of Kihl) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—In an action to recover damages for legal malpractice and breach of contract, the defendant Stuart R. Kramer appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Spodek, J.), dated October 6, 1994, as denied his cross motion to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against him.
Ordered that the appeal is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.
Based on our determination in Goicoechea v Law Offices of Stephen R. Kihl (234 AD2d 507 [decided herewith]), the instant appeal is rendered academic. Miller, J. P., Sullivan, Altman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
234 A.D.2d 509, 651 N.Y.S.2d 926, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13197, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goicoechea-v-law-offices-of-kihl-nyappdiv-1996.