Goetze v. United States

182 U.S. 221, 21 S. Ct. 742, 45 L. Ed. 1065, 1901 U.S. LEXIS 1226
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedMay 27, 1901
DocketNo. 340; No. 515
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 182 U.S. 221 (Goetze v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Goetze v. United States, 182 U.S. 221, 21 S. Ct. 742, 45 L. Ed. 1065, 1901 U.S. LEXIS 1226 (1901).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Brown,

after making the above statement, delivered the opinion of the court.

As the sole question presented by the record in these case's was whether Porto Eico and the Hawaiian Islands were foreign countries within the meaning of the tariff laws, we must hold, [222]*222for the reasons stated in De Lima v. Bidwell, just decided, that the board of general appraisers had no jurisdiction of the cases.

The judgments of the Circuit Court are therefore reversed, and the cases remanded to that .court with instructions to reverse the action of the hoard of general appraisers.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Goetze v. United States
182 U.S. 221 (Supreme Court, 1901)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
182 U.S. 221, 21 S. Ct. 742, 45 L. Ed. 1065, 1901 U.S. LEXIS 1226, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goetze-v-united-states-scotus-1901.