Godwin v. United States of America (INMATE 3)

District Court, M.D. Alabama·Decided May 1, 2020·No. 2:16-cv-00509·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

JERALD DEAN GODWIN, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. v. ) 2:16cv509-MHT ) (WO) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Respondent. )

ORDER It is ORDERED that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2553(c), petitioner’s motion for a certificate of appealability (doc. no. 47) is granted. The court finds that the petitioner “has made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right,” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2), as to the following issue: Whether petitioner’s 18 U.S.C § 924(c) conviction is unconstitutional in light of Johnson v. United States, 135 S. Ct. 2551 (2015), and/ or United States v. Davis, 139 S. Ct. 2319 (2019). DONE, this the 1st day of May, 2020. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Godwin v. United States of America (INMATE 3), (M.D. Ala. 2020).

Godwin v. United States of America (INMATE 3) (Godwin v. United States of America (INMATE 3)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Johnson v. United States
576 U.S. 591 (Supreme Court, 2015)
United States v. Davis
588 U.S. 445 (Supreme Court, 2019)