Godfrey v. G.E. Capital Auto Lease, Inc.
967 N.E.2d 696, 18 N.Y.3d 951, 2012 NY Slip Op 68585, 944 N.Y.S.2d 472, 2012 N.Y. LEXIS 552
Opinion
Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution (see Cuadrado v New York City Tr. Auth., 65 AD3d 434 [2009], lv dismissed 14 NY3d 748 [2010]).
Judge Read taking no part.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Godfrey v. G.E. Capital Auto Lease, Inc., 967 N.E.2d 696, 18 N.Y.3d 951, 2012 NY Slip Op 68585, 944 N.Y.S.2d 472, 2012 N.Y. LEXIS 552 (N.Y. 2012).
967 N.E.2d 696 (Godfrey v. G.E. Capital Auto Lease, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Godfrey v. GE CAPITAL AUTO LEASE, INC.
967 N.E.2d 696 (New York Court of Appeals, 2012)