Godfrey v. GE CAPITAL AUTO LEASE, INC.
967 N.E.2d 696, 18 N.Y.3d 951, 944 N.Y.S.2d 472, 2012 NY Slip Op 68585
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedMarch 29, 2012
DocketMotion No: 2011-1365
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 967 N.E.2d 696 (Godfrey v. GE CAPITAL AUTO LEASE, INC.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Godfrey v. GE CAPITAL AUTO LEASE, INC., 967 N.E.2d 696, 18 N.Y.3d 951, 944 N.Y.S.2d 472, 2012 NY Slip Op 68585 (N.Y. 2012).
Opinion
KENZIE GODFREY, Appellant,
v.
G.E. CAPITAL AUTO LEASE, INC., Respondent, et al., Defendants.
Court of Appeals of New York.
Judge READ taking no part.
Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution (see Cuadrado v New York City Tr. Auth., 65 AD3d 434 [2009], lv dismissed 14 NY3d 748 [2010]).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Great American Insurance Companies v. Bearcat Financial Services, Inc.
967 N.E.2d 697 (New York Court of Appeals, 2012)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
967 N.E.2d 696, 18 N.Y.3d 951, 944 N.Y.S.2d 472, 2012 NY Slip Op 68585, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/godfrey-v-ge-capital-auto-lease-inc-ny-2012.