Glod v. Baker

851 So. 2d 1279, 3 La.App. 3 Cir. 206, 2003 La. App. LEXIS 2245, 2003 WL 21804570
CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedAugust 6, 2003
DocketNo. 03-206
StatusPublished

This text of 851 So. 2d 1279 (Glod v. Baker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Glod v. Baker, 851 So. 2d 1279, 3 La.App. 3 Cir. 206, 2003 La. App. LEXIS 2245, 2003 WL 21804570 (La. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

DOUCET, Chief Judge.

For the reasons set forth in Glod v. Baker, 02-988 (La.App. 3 Cir. 8/6/03), 851 So.2d 1255, 2003 WL 21804398, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Costs of this appeal shall be paid two-thirds by Baker and Baiers, and one-third by Vivi-ano and his entities not to include the two LLCs.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Glod v. Baker
851 So. 2d 1255 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
851 So. 2d 1279, 3 La.App. 3 Cir. 206, 2003 La. App. LEXIS 2245, 2003 WL 21804570, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/glod-v-baker-lactapp-2003.