Glenn v. State

602 S.E.2d 577, 278 Ga. 291, 2004 Fulton County D. Rep. 2956, 2004 Ga. LEXIS 605
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedSeptember 13, 2004
DocketS04A0691
StatusPublished
Cited by30 cases

This text of 602 S.E.2d 577 (Glenn v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Glenn v. State, 602 S.E.2d 577, 278 Ga. 291, 2004 Fulton County D. Rep. 2956, 2004 Ga. LEXIS 605 (Ga. 2004).

Opinion

Fletcher, Chief Justice.

Following a bench trial in Wilkes County, Crystal Glenn was convicted of two counts of felony murder, two counts of cruelty to children in the first degree, and aggravated battery for her involvement in the abuse and death of her daughter, Tynisha Glenn. 1 On *292 appeal, Glenn contends that the evidence was insufficient to convict her as a party to the crimes. We conclude that the evidence was sufficient to convict Glenn of one count of cruelty to children, but insufficient with respect to the other count of cruelty to children, the aggravated battery count, and both counts of felony murder. Accordingly, we affirm in part and reverse in part.

1. The evidence presented at trial shows that Tynisha Glenn was born on April 7, 1999. Her 17-year-old mother, Crystal Glenn, suffered serious post-delivery complications, which resulted in the loss of a large amount of blood and an emergency hysterectomy. Tynisha left the hospital before Glenn, and stayed with Glenn’s mother for a week until Glenn was finally discharged. After Glenn was discharged, Tynisha came to live with Glenn and her boyfriend, Edward Quinn, in their Wilkes County home. Quinn was not Tynisha’s father.

Sometime during the morning of April 26, 1999, Glenn and others noticed that Tynisha was favoring one of her legs. At 10:45 p.m. that night, Glenn and Quinn finally took Tynisha to a hospital in Athens. Later, investigators asked Glenn why she had waited so long before taking the child to the hospital, and why she had taken her to Athens when the Wilkes County Hospital was much closer to their home. Glenn stated that she had been worried that the Department of Family and Children Services would take Tynisha away because on a prior occasion, at the Wilkes County Hospital, DFCS had threatened to take away one of Glenn’s older children.

Doctors in Athens determined that Tynisha suffered from a “bucket-fracture” just above her knee, which the doctors believed was most likely the result of forceful twisting or shaking. Although Quinn told the doctors that Glenn had rolled over on the baby in bed, the doctors testified that the injury could not have occurred in that manner. Because the doctors had no solid evidence of abuse, Tynisha was discharged in the care of Glenn and Quinn.

Tynisha spent the night of April 26 at Glenn’s mother’s house in Oglethorpe County, but was returned to Glenn’s house in Wilkes County around noon on April 27. One of Glenn’s sisters visited Tynisha at Glenn’s house that evening, and later testified that the baby appeared normal when she left around 9:00 p.m. According to *293 the investigator’s testimony, Glenn stated that she left Tynisha in Quinn’s care when she went to sleep for the night. Around 3:00 a.m. that night, Quinn awoke Glenn and told her that Tynisha was having trouble breathing.

At 3:30 a.m. on April 28, Tynisha was admitted to Wilkes County Hospital, unconscious and barely breathing. The doctors ordered antibiotic treatment for sepsis, and dispatched an ambulance to transport her to the Medical College of Georgia. The doctor testified that only Quinn answered questions about the baby’s condition, and that he referenced the leg injury from two days before and said that it occurred when Glenn rolled over on the baby. Tynisha never regained consciousness, and died from brain damage as a result of a blunt force head trauma on April 30, 1999.

Quinn pled guilty to felony murder and cruelty to children, and the evidence that he was the actual perpetrator of the abuse of Tynisha was strong. Quinn’s grandfather, who lived with Glenn and Quinn, told investigators that he witnessed Quinn shaking the baby and striking her head on a wall. Other witnesses testified that they had observed Quinn become upset and violent with children when they cried. Witnesses also testified that Quinn’s babies in Michigan had suffered from suspicious injuries, including broken ribs. On the other hand, numerous witnesses testified that Glenn had never abused her children.

(a) In Count Six, Glenn was charged with cruelty to children by intentionally delaying medical treatment for Tynisha’s fractured leg on April 26. The acts underlying Count Six are explicitly distinguished in the indictment from the acts underlying Counts One through Five. From the evidence presented at trial, the judge was authorized to find that Glenn waited for at least a number of hours before seeking medical attention for Tynisha, and that she took Tynisha to Athens instead of the much closer Wilkes County Hospital to avoid a confrontation with DFCS.

Under OCGA § 16-5-70 (b), “[a] person commits the offense of cruelty to children in the first degree when such person maliciously causes a child under the age of 18 cruel or excessive physical or mental pain.” Malice, as an element of the crime of cruelty to children, can be shown by intentionally and unjustifiably delaying necessary medical attention for a child, as that delay may cause the child to suffer from cruel and excessive physical pain. 2 After reviewing the evidence in support of Count Six in the light most favorable to the verdict, we conclude that there was sufficient evidence for a rational *294 trier of fact to find Glenn guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of cruelty to children. 3

(b) In Counts Two, Three, Four, and Five, Glenn was charged with cruelty to children, aggravated battery, and two counts of felony murder for her role in the acts that caused Tynisha’s head injury. 4 At trial, the State argued that Glenn was guilty as a party to the crime because she was concerned in the commission of those acts even if she did not commit them directly. Although mere presence at the scene of the crime is insufficient grounds for a conviction, a person can be guilty as a party to the crime if they intentionally aid, abet, encourage, facilitate, assist, or are otherwise concerned in the commission of the acts that constitute the crime. 5 “Aiding and abetting encompasses the concept of helping in the commission of a crime.” 6

In support of these charges, the State presented evidence that Glenn allowed Quinn to care for Tynisha when Glenn was sleeping even though she had been told earlier that day that Quinn may have been responsible for Tynisha’s leg injury and that Quinn may have been abusive towards other babies. Further, Glenn failed to participate in the emergency room discussion or inform doctors about what others had said about Quinn’s treatment of Tynisha and his other babies.

But the State was required to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Glenn intentionally assisted, aided, abetted, encouraged, or otherwise concerned herself in the abuse of Tynisha, not that she did so inadvertently. 7 This the State failed to do. There was absolutely no evidence showing that Glenn intentionally assisted Quinn’s abuse of Tynisha in any way.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sidrick Raymone Melancon, Sr. v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2025
People v. Collins
California Supreme Court, 2025
Cortney Bell v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2022
Malverty v. State
303 Ga. 102 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2018)
Freeman v. the State
775 S.E.2d 258 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2015)
Johnson v. the State
760 S.E.2d 682 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2014)
Tabb v. State
723 S.E.2d 295 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2012)
Wells v. State
710 S.E.2d 860 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2011)
Metz v. State
669 S.E.2d 121 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2008)
Murray v. State
667 S.E.2d 382 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2008)
Riley v. State
663 S.E.2d 835 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2008)
John v. State
653 S.E.2d 435 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2007)
In the Interest of B. D.
651 S.E.2d 129 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2007)
Grayer v. State
647 S.E.2d 264 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2007)
Yancey v. State
641 S.E.2d 524 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2007)
Hill v. State
639 S.E.2d 637 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2006)
Revells v. State
640 S.E.2d 587 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2006)
Brown v. State
636 S.E.2d 717 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2006)
Delacruz v. State
627 S.E.2d 579 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2006)
Gore v. State
627 S.E.2d 198 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
602 S.E.2d 577, 278 Ga. 291, 2004 Fulton County D. Rep. 2956, 2004 Ga. LEXIS 605, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/glenn-v-state-ga-2004.