Glenn R. Bryant v. Walter E. Craven, Warden, Folsom State Prison
This text of 442 F.2d 1043 (Glenn R. Bryant v. Walter E. Craven, Warden, Folsom State Prison) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant appeals from an order granting appellee’s petition for a writ of ha-beas corpus, contending that the district court erred in allocating the burden of proof on the question of appellee’s comprehension of the consequences of his guilty plea.
We do not reach the appellee’s contention, because we conclude that affirmance of the order is required by Schram v. Cupp (9th Cir. 1970) 436 F.2d 692, holding that a guilty plea entered without counsel and without a valid waiver of counsel cannot be sustained. The record in this case cannot be distinguished from that in Schram on the waiver issue.
The order is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
442 F.2d 1043, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 10267, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/glenn-r-bryant-v-walter-e-craven-warden-folsom-state-prison-ca9-1971.