Glendening v. Western Union Telegraph Co.
150 N.Y.S. 1088
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Glendening v. Western Union Telegraph Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 163 A.D. 489 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 4, 1914·No. No. 6405·Published
Opinion
Accepting the contention of the plaintiff that he attempted to and did set out but one cause of action in his complaint, paragraphs 8, 9, all but the first six lines of paragraph 19, and paragraph 22 are irrelevant and redundant to said cause of action so claimed to be alleged. The order appealed from should therefore be modified, by providing that the matter indicated should be stricken from the complaint, and, as so modified, affirmed, without costs to either party.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Glendening v. Western Union Telegraph Co., 150 N.Y.S. 1088 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1914).
150 N.Y.S. 1088 (Glendening v. Western Union Telegraph Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.