Glendening v. Western Union Telegraph Co.

165 A.D. 952
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Glendening v. Western Union Telegraph Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 163 A.D. 489

Opinion

Per Curiam:

Accepting the contention of the plaintiff that he attempted to and did set out but one cause of action in his complaint, paragraphs 8, 9, all but the first six lines of paragraph 19, and paragraph 22 are irrelevant and redundant to said cause of action so claimed to be alleged. The order appealed from should, therefore, be modified by providing that the matter indicated should be stricken from the complaint and as so modified affirmed, without costs to either party. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ. Order modified as stated in order and as modified affirmed, without costs. Order to be settled on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Glendening v. Western Union Telegraph Co., 165 A.D. 952 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1914).

165 A.D. 952 (Glendening v. Western Union Telegraph Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.