Glaze v. State

547 So. 2d 313, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1883, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 4474, 1989 WL 88026
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 9, 1989·No. No. 88-3083·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the order of revocation of probation except as to Counts II-IV. Since the findings of violations contained in Counts II-IV lack an evidentiary basis, the cause is remanded with instructions to modify the order by striking those counts. See Higgs v. State, 470 So.2d 75 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985). Additionally, appellant’s sentence is reversed and remanded to the trial court with instructions to resentenee appellant in accordance with his presumptive guidelines range, or in accordance with the one-cell “bump-up” authorized by Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.701(d)(14). See Lambert v. State, 545 So.2d 838 (Fla.1989).

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED.

LETTS, WALDEN and GUNTHER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Glaze v. State, 547 So. 2d 313, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1883, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 4474, 1989 WL 88026 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

547 So. 2d 313 (Glaze v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cusmina v. State
549 So. 2d 1168 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)