Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Cusmina v. State

Cusmina v. State

549 So. 2d 1168, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2376, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 5546, 1989 WL 118631
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 11, 1989·No. No. 88-3284·Published

Opinion

GUNTHER, Judge.

The trial court’s order revoking Appellant’s probation is affirmed. However, the case is remanded for the trial court to strike those findings that probation conditions 9 and 10 were violated. See § 948.03(1), Fla.Stat. (1987); Chatman v. State, 365 So.2d 789 (Fla.4th DCA 1978); Glaze v. State, 547 So.2d 313 (Fla.4th DCA 1989).

DELL and GARRETT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cusmina v. State, 549 So. 2d 1168, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2376, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 5546, 1989 WL 118631 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

549 So. 2d 1168 (Cusmina v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Chatman v. State
365 So. 2d 789 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1978)
Glaze v. State
547 So. 2d 313 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)