Cusmina v. State
549 So. 2d 1168, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2376, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 5546, 1989 WL 118631
This text of 549 So. 2d 1168 (Cusmina v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Cusmina v. State, 549 So. 2d 1168, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2376, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 5546, 1989 WL 118631 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).
Opinion
The trial court’s order revoking Appellant’s probation is affirmed. However, the case is remanded for the trial court to strike those findings that probation conditions 9 and 10 were violated. See § 948.03(1), Fla.Stat. (1987); Chatman v. State, 365 So.2d 789 (Fla.4th DCA 1978); Glaze v. State, 547 So.2d 313 (Fla.4th DCA 1989).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Chatman v. State
365 So. 2d 789 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1978)
Glaze v. State
547 So. 2d 313 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
549 So. 2d 1168, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2376, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 5546, 1989 WL 118631, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cusmina-v-state-fladistctapp-1989.