Glaze v. City of Alabaster

211 So. 3d 859, 2016 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 36
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
DecidedJune 3, 2016
DocketCR-15-0553
StatusPublished

This text of 211 So. 3d 859 (Glaze v. City of Alabaster) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Glaze v. City of Alabaster, 211 So. 3d 859, 2016 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 36 (Ala. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinions

WINDOM, Presiding Judge.

Mitchell Vann Glaze appeals his conviction for driving under the influence, a violation of § 32-5A-191(a)(5), Ala.Code 1975, and his subsequent sentence to 90 days in jail, which was suspended for 24 months.

On January 6, 2016, the municipal court conducted Glaze’s trial. At the conclusion of the trial, the municipal court took the parties’ positions under advisement but did not pronounce Glaze’s adjudication of guilt or sentence in open court. Thereafter, on February 18, 2016, Glaze filed a notice of appeal to this Court.

In order “to enter a judgment of conviction, the trial court must pronounce in open court both an adjudication of guilt and a sentence.” Benn v. State, 211 So.3d 857, 859 (Ala.Crim.App.2016) (citing Ex parte Kelley, [Ms. 1131451, Nov. 6, 2015] — So.3d —, — (Ala.2015)). “Absent a judgment of conviction, a conviction is not ripe for appeal,” and this Court lacks jurisdiction to review the cause. Ex parte Kelley, — So.3d at — (citing Ex parte Walker, 152 So.3d 1247, 1252 (Ala.2014)).

Here, the municipal court did not pronounce in open court Glaze’s adjudication of guilt or his sentence. As a result, there has not been a judgment of conviction entered that would support this appeal. Ex parte Kelley, — So.3d at —; Benn, 211 So.3d at 859. Accordingly, this Court lacks jurisdiction to consider Glaze’s appeal, and it is dismissed.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

KELLUM, J., concurs. WELCH, J., concurs specially, with opinion. JOINER, J., concurs specially, with opinion, which is joined by BURKE, J. BURKE, J., concurs in the result.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Parker v. City of Tuscaloosa
698 So. 2d 1171 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1997)
Ex Parte Town of Gulf Shores
412 So. 2d 1259 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1982)
Ex Parte White
403 So. 2d 292 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1981)
Marquis v. State
439 So. 2d 197 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1983)
Ex Parte Maye
799 So. 2d 944 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 2001)
Ex Parte Eason
929 So. 2d 992 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 2005)
Thornton v. State
390 So. 2d 1093 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1980)
Walker v. State
152 So. 3d 1247 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 2014)
Benn v. State
211 So. 3d 857 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 2016)
Hill v. State
733 So. 2d 937 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1998)
Burnsed v. City of Evergreen
844 So. 2d 526 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 2001)
King v. State
862 So. 2d 677 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
211 So. 3d 859, 2016 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 36, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/glaze-v-city-of-alabaster-alacrimapp-2016.