Ex Parte White

Supreme Court of Alabama

Ex Parte White

403 So. 2d 292

CourtSupreme Court of Alabama

DecidedAugust 21, 1981

Docket80-689

StatusPublished

Cited by13 cases

This text of 403 So. 2d 292 (Ex Parte White) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ex Parte White, 403 So. 2d 292 (Ala. 1981).

Pincite

Opinion

The duty is not on the defendant to request a court reporter. He is entitled to a court reporter but can waive the right. *Page 293

By denying the writ, we are not to be understood as approving the statement by the Court of Criminal Appeals that "[n]o violation of the guaranty of due process results from the failure to provide a court reporter to preserve a record of testimony in the absence of a request therefore," for which proposition that court cited Aldridge v. State, 278 Ala. 470,179 So.2d 51 (1965).

WRIT DENIED.

MADDOX, JONES, SHORES and BEATTY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The duty is not on the defendant to request a court reporter. He is entitled to a court reporter but can waive the right. *Page 293

By denying the writ, we are not to be understood as approving the statement by the Court of Criminal Appeals that "[n]o violation of the guaranty of due process results from the failure to provide a court reporter to preserve a record of testimony in the absence of a request therefore," for which proposition that court cited Aldridge v. State, 278 Ala. 470,179 So.2d 51 (1965).

WRIT DENIED.

MADDOX, JONES, SHORES and BEATTY, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

403 So. 2d 292, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-white-ala-1981.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack