Glaser v. Huette
This text of 232 A.D. 119 (Glaser v. Huette) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
We think that since the parties now here were not adversaries in the former suits but codefendants wherein no duty existed to contest the issue of negligence as between them and no pleadings existed between them, the decisions there settled nothing as to the liability of the codefendants to each other. Therefore, the plea of res adjudícala was not available to this-defendant.
The order should be affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.
Finch, P. J., Merrell and Sherman, JJ., concur; Martin, J., dissents.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
232 A.D. 119, 249 N.Y.S. 374, 1931 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13744, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/glaser-v-huette-nyappdiv-1931.