Gittelson v. McKnight

243 P. 892, 75 Cal. App. 697, 1925 Cal. App. LEXIS 36
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Gittelson v. McKnight. Read the opinion of the Court — 75 Cal. App. 698
California Court of Appeal·Decided December 22, 1925·No. Docket No. 5277.·Published

Opinion

THE COURT.

[1] In the above-entitled matter the motion to dismiss the appeal as to John H. McKnight, administrator of the estate of Agnes W. McKnight, deceased, is denied. (Rubio Canon etc. Assn. v. Everett, 154 Cal. 29 [96 P. 811].) *Page 698

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gittelson v. McKnight, 243 P. 892, 75 Cal. App. 697, 1925 Cal. App. LEXIS 36 (Cal. Ct. App. 1925).

243 P. 892 (Gittelson v. McKnight) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rubio Cañon Land & Water Ass'n v. Everett
96 P. 811 (California Supreme Court, 1908)