Gittelson v. McKnight

243 P. 892, 75 Cal. App. 697, 1925 Cal. App. LEXIS 36
CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal
DecidedDecember 22, 1925
DocketDocket No. 5277.
StatusPublished

This text of 243 P. 892 (Gittelson v. McKnight) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gittelson v. McKnight, 243 P. 892, 75 Cal. App. 697, 1925 Cal. App. LEXIS 36 (Cal. Ct. App. 1925).

Opinion

THE COURT.

[1] In the above-entitled matter the motion to dismiss the appeal as to John H. McKnight, administrator of the estate of Agnes W. McKnight, deceased, is denied. (Rubio Canon etc. Assn. v. Everett, 154 Cal. 29 [96 P. 811].) *Page 698

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rubio Cañon Land & Water Ass'n v. Everett
96 P. 811 (California Supreme Court, 1908)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
243 P. 892, 75 Cal. App. 697, 1925 Cal. App. LEXIS 36, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gittelson-v-mcknight-calctapp-1925.