Gitkin Co. v. United States
60 Cust. Ct. 1051, 1968 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1824
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Gitkin Co. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 58 Cust. Ct. 383 →
United States Customs Court·Decided June 25, 1968·No. No. P68/276; protests 64/17742 and 66/16176 (New York)·Published
Opinion
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of folding doors similar in all material respects to those the subject of Gitkin Co. v. United States (58 Cust. Ct. 383, C.D. 2997) or louvered folding doors similar in all material respects to those the subject of B. A. MacKenzie & Co., Inc. v. United States (58 Cust. Ct. 460, C.D. 3020), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gitkin Co. v. United States, 60 Cust. Ct. 1051, 1968 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1824 (cusc 1968).
60 Cust. Ct. 1051 (Gitkin Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Gitkin Co. v. United States
58 Cust. Ct. 383 (U.S. Customs Court, 1967)
B. A. McKenzie & Co. v. United States
58 Cust. Ct. 460 (U.S. Customs Court, 1967)