Gitkin Co. v. United States
This text of 60 Cust. Ct. 1013 (Gitkin Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of folding doors [1014]*1014similar ill all material respects to those the subject of Gitkin Co. v. United States (58 Cust. Ct. 383, C.D. 2997) or louvered, folding doors similar in all material respects to those the subject of B. A. McKenzie & Co., Inc. v. United States (58 Cust. Ct. 460, C.D. 3020), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
60 Cust. Ct. 1013, 1968 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1952, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gitkin-co-v-united-states-cusc-1968.