Gisbrecht v. Barnhart

Ninth Circuit

Gisbrecht v. Barnhart

300 F.3d 1158, 2002 WL 1963405

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedAugust 26, 2002

DocketNos. 99-35496, 99-35497, 99-36038 and 99-36131

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 300 F.3d 1158 (Gisbrecht v. Barnhart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gisbrecht v. Barnhart, 300 F.3d 1158, 2002 WL 1963405 (9th Cir. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The mandate is hereby recalled for purposes of disposition.

The Supreme Court of the United States has reversed our decision concerning the method for calculating attorney fees in cases of this kind and has remanded the matter for further proceedings. Gisbrecht [1159]*1159v. Apfel, 238 F.3d 1196 (9th Cir.2000), reversed and remanded by Gisbrecht v. Barnhart, — U.S. -, 122 S.Ct. 1817, 152 L.Ed.2d 996 (2002). We, in turn, remand the matter to the district court to conduct such further proceedings as may be appropriate in the light of the Supreme Court’s opinion. We consolidated these cases for the purpose of our earlier opinion but, because individualized consideration of each case is required, will return each case to its respective judge.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The mandate is hereby recalled for purposes of disposition.

The Supreme Court of the United States has reversed our decision concerning the method for calculating attorney fees in cases of this kind and has remanded the matter for further proceedings. Gisbrecht [1159]*1159v. Apfel, 238 F.3d 1196 (9th Cir.2000), reversed and remanded by Gisbrecht v. Barnhart, — U.S. -, 122 S.Ct. 1817, 152 L.Ed.2d 996 (2002). We, in turn, remand the matter to the district court to conduct such further proceedings as may be appropriate in the light of the Supreme Court’s opinion. We consolidated these cases for the purpose of our earlier opinion but, because individualized consideration of each case is required, will return each case to its respective judge.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

Gary E. Gisbrecht v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Barbara A. Miller v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Nancy Sandine v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Donald L. Anderson v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration

300 F.3d 1158 (Ninth Circuit, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

300 F.3d 1158, 2002 WL 1963405, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gisbrecht-v-barnhart-ca9-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack