Girard v. Gettig

2 Binn. 234, 1810 Pa. LEXIS 3
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided January 6, 1810·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

Tilghman C. J.

stated the opinion of the court upon the first exception as follows.

As it seems to be growing into a custom, to take an exception, because the court below would not order a nonsuit, it may save future trouble of that kind to declare our opinion, that such exceptions cannot be sustained; because it is out of the power of the court to order a nonsuit against the consent of the plaintiff, who may refuse to enter it, and insist on taking the verdict. This is no injury to the party who wishes the court’s opinion; because he may always prepare the particular point on which the opinion is desired, and the court is bound to give it.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Girard v. Gettig, 2 Binn. 234, 1810 Pa. LEXIS 3 (Pa. 1810).

2 Binn. 234 (Girard v. Gettig) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hampson v. Taylor
8 A. 831 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1885)
Ballentine v. White
77 Pa. 20 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1874)
Negley v. Lindsay
67 Pa. 217 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1871)
Gould v. Crawford
2 Pa. 89 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1845)
Wells v. Gaty
8 Mo. 681 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1844)
Rabun ex rel. Taylor v. Fowler
1 Charlton 60 (Chatham Superior Court, Ga., 1821)
Irving v. Taggart
1 Serg. & Rawle 360 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1815)
Johnson v. Smock
1 N.J.L. 106 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1791)