Girard Trust Co. v. Ocean & Lake Realty Co.

Supreme Court

Girard Trust Co. v. Ocean & Lake Realty Co.

286 U.S. 523, 52 S. Ct. 494

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedApril 18, 1932

DocketNo. 530

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 286 U.S. 523 (Girard Trust Co. v. Ocean & Lake Realty Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Girard Trust Co. v. Ocean & Lake Realty Co., 286 U.S. 523, 52 S. Ct. 494 (1932).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The appeal herein is dismissed for the reason that the judgment of the state court sought here to be reviewed was based upon a non-federal ground adequate to support it. Broad River Power Co. v. South Carolina, 281 U. S. 537, 540, 541; Cross Lake Club v. Louisiana, 224 U. S. 632, 639, 640; Long Sault Development Co. v. Call, 242 U. S. 272, 277, 278; Hardin-Wyandot Lighting Co. v. Village of Upper Sandusky, 251 U. S. 173, 178, 179; McCoy v. Shaw, 277 U. S. 302, 303.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The appeal herein is dismissed for the reason that the judgment of the state court sought here to be reviewed was based upon a non-federal ground adequate to support it. Broad River Power Co. v. South Carolina, 281 U. S. 537, 540, 541; Cross Lake Club v. Louisiana, 224 U. S. 632, 639, 640; Long Sault Development Co. v. Call, 242 U. S. 272, 277, 278; Hardin-Wyandot Lighting Co. v. Village of Upper Sandusky, 251 U. S. 173, 178, 179; McCoy v. Shaw, 277 U. S. 302, 303.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

286 U.S. 523, 52 S. Ct. 494, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/girard-trust-co-v-ocean-lake-realty-co-scotus-1932.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack