Girard Trust Co. v. Ocean & Lake Realty Co.
286 U.S. 523, 52 S. Ct. 494
Opinion
The appeal herein is dismissed for the reason that the judgment of the state court sought here to be reviewed was based upon a non-federal ground adequate to support it. Broad River Power Co. v. South Carolina, 281 U. S. 537, 540, 541; Cross Lake Club v. Louisiana, 224 U. S. 632, 639, 640; Long Sault Development Co. v. Call, 242 U. S. 272, 277, 278; Hardin-Wyandot Lighting Co. v. Village of Upper Sandusky, 251 U. S. 173, 178, 179; McCoy v. Shaw, 277 U. S. 302, 303.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Girard Trust Co. v. Ocean & Lake Realty Co., 286 U.S. 523, 52 S. Ct. 494 (1932).
286 U.S. 523 (Girard Trust Co. v. Ocean & Lake Realty Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Watson v. City of Hallandale
193 So. 2d 195 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1966)
Ex parte Steckler
292 U.S. 610 (Supreme Court, 1934)
Liggett & Myers Tobacco Co. v. South Carolina
291 U.S. 652 (Supreme Court, 1934)
KFAB Broadcasting Co. v. Sorensen
290 U.S. 599 (Supreme Court, 1933)
Real Estate-Land Title & Trust Co. v. Springfield
287 U.S. 577 (Supreme Court, 1932)