Ex parte Steckler
292 U.S. 610, 54 S. Ct. 781
Opinion
The appeal herein is dismissed for the reason that the decision of the state court sought here to be reviewed was based upon a non-federal ground adequate to support it. New Orleans Water Works Co. v. Louisiana Sugar Co., 125 U.S. 18, 38, 39; Cross Lake Club v. Louisiana, 224 U.S. 632, 639, 640; Long Sault Development Co. v. Call, 242 U.S. 272, 277, 278; Hardin-Wyandot Lighting Co. v. Upper Sandusky, 251 U.S. 173, 178, 179; Girard Trust Co. v. Ocean & Lake Realty Co., 286 U.S. 523; Real Estate-Land Title & Trust Co. v. Springfield, 287 U.S. 577.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ex parte Steckler, 292 U.S. 610, 54 S. Ct. 781 (1934).
292 U.S. 610 (Ex parte Steckler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
New Orleans Waterworks Co. v. Louisiana Sugar Refining Co.
125 U.S. 18 (Supreme Court, 1888)
Cross Lake Shooting and Fishing Club v. Louisiana
224 U.S. 632 (Supreme Court, 1912)
Long Sault Development Co. v. Call
242 U.S. 272 (Supreme Court, 1916)
Hardin-Wyandot Lighting Co. v. Village of Upper Sandusky
251 U.S. 173 (Supreme Court, 1919)
Girard Trust Co. v. Ocean & Lake Realty Co.
286 U.S. 523 (Supreme Court, 1932)
Real Estate-Land Title & Trust Co. v. Springfield
287 U.S. 577 (Supreme Court, 1932)