Ex parte Steckler
This text of 292 U.S. 610 (Ex parte Steckler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The appeal herein is dismissed for the reason that the decision of the state court sought here to be reviewed was based upon a non-federal ground adequate to support it. New Orleans Water Works Co. v. Louisiana Sugar Co., 125 U.S. 18, 38, 39; Cross Lake Club v. Louisiana, 224 U.S. 632, 639, 640; Long Sault Development Co. v. Call, 242 U.S. 272, 277, 278; Hardin-Wyandot Lighting Co. v. Upper Sandusky, 251 U.S. 173, 178, 179; Girard Trust Co. v. Ocean & Lake Realty Co., 286 U.S. 523; Real Estate-Land Title & Trust Co. v. Springfield, 287 U.S. 577.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
292 U.S. 610, 54 S. Ct. 781, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-steckler-scotus-1934.