Giordano v. Henry

44 A.D.2d 835, 355 N.Y.S.2d 463, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5037
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 13, 1974
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 44 A.D.2d 835 (Giordano v. Henry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Giordano v. Henry, 44 A.D.2d 835, 355 N.Y.S.2d 463, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5037 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1974).

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to article 78 of the CPLR (1) to restrain the holding of an announced civil service competitive promotional examination for the position of General Superintendent (Sanitation) ”, scheduled for October 31, 1973, or (2) in the alternative, to declare that petitioners are in an exempt or noncompetitive class in connection with the positions they hold, petitioners appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered November 27, 1973, as dismissed the petition. Judgment affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs. We see no reason to disturb the civil service classification of the position of “ General Superintendent (Sanitation) ” as competitive, especially in view of the fact that the predecessor titles to this new position have traditionally been in the competitive class. We agree with Special Term that there is a strong public policy in this State (N. Y. Const., art. V, § 6) that appointments and promotions in the civil service of the State shall, as far as practical, be made according to merit and fitness, as ascertained, to the extent possible, by competitive examination. Furthermore, the law is clear that petitioners’ provisional appointments, no matter how long, cannot ripen into permanent appointments; and their retention as provisionals, being now illegal, should be terminated as soon as possible (Koso v. Greene, 260 N. Y. 491; Matter of McNamara v. McCoy, 36 A D 2d 787; Matter of Meyer v. Hoberman, 30 A D 2d 938, affd. 24 N Y 2d 830). Hopkins, Acting P. J., Martuseello, Shapiro, Christ, and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Vacca v. Town of Southeast
206 A.D.2d 433 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
Winkler v. Moore
110 Misc. 2d 785 (New York Supreme Court, 1981)
Suffolk County Court Employees Ass'n v. Office of Court Administration
102 Misc. 2d 837 (New York Supreme Court, 1980)
Gould v. Griffin
69 A.D.2d 1015 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1979)
Hannon v. Bartlett
63 A.D.2d 810 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1978)
Mierzwa v. Genesee County Civil Service Commission
55 A.D.2d 815 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
44 A.D.2d 835, 355 N.Y.S.2d 463, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5037, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/giordano-v-henry-nyappdiv-1974.