Gioia v. Gioia

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Gioia v. Gioia

257 A.D. 920, 12 N.Y.S.2d 733, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8402

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 19, 1939

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 257 A.D. 920 (Gioia v. Gioia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gioia v. Gioia, 257 A.D. 920, 12 N.Y.S.2d 733, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8402 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, on the ground that in our judgment the arbitration provisions do not provide an exclusive remedy in accordance with the reasoning of Van Voorhis, J., at Special Term. [See 171 Misc. 683.] All concur. (The order denies a motion by defendant Alfonso Gioia to compel plaintiff to proceed to arbitration of his cause of action against said defendant.) Present — Sears, P. J., Crosby, Lewis, Taylor and Dowling, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, on the ground that in our judgment the arbitration provisions do not provide an exclusive remedy in accordance with the reasoning of Van Voorhis, J., at Special Term. [See 171 Misc. 683.] All concur. (The order denies a motion by defendant Alfonso Gioia to compel plaintiff to proceed to arbitration of his cause of action against said defendant.) Present — Sears, P. J., Crosby, Lewis, Taylor and Dowling, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

257 A.D. 920, 12 N.Y.S.2d 733, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8402, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gioia-v-gioia-nyappdiv-1939.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack