Gioia v. Gioia
257 A.D. 920, 12 N.Y.S.2d 733, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8402
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 19, 1939·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, on the ground that in our judgment the arbitration provisions do not provide an exclusive remedy in accordance with the reasoning of Van Voorhis, J., at Special Term. [See 171 Misc. 683.] All concur. (The order denies a motion by defendant Alfonso Gioia to compel plaintiff to proceed to arbitration of his cause of action against said defendant.) Present — Sears, P. J., Crosby, Lewis, Taylor and Dowling, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gioia v. Gioia, 257 A.D. 920, 12 N.Y.S.2d 733, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8402 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).
257 A.D. 920 (Gioia v. Gioia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Rottkamp v. Eger
74 Misc. 2d 858 (New York Supreme Court, 1973)
In re the Arbitration Between Board of Education & Heckler Electric Co.
26 Misc. 2d 876 (New York Supreme Court, 1960)