Gimbel Bros., Inc. v. United States

24 Cust. Ct. 566, 1950 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2066
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Gimbel Bros., Inc. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 26 Cust. Ct. 31
United States Customs Court·Decided February 27, 1950·No. No. 7800; Entry No. 701898, etc.·Published

Opinion

Lawrence, Judge:

It bas been agreed between tbe parties hereto that the issues herein relating to the merchandise the subject of these appeals are the same in all material respects as those decided in United States v. Gothic Watch Co., 23 Cust. Ct. 235, Reap. Dec. 7712, affirming the judgment in Gothic Watch Co. v. United States, 19 Cust. Ct. 309, Reap. Dec. 7438, and that the record in Reap. Dec. 7712, supra, may be incorporated herein.

Upon the agreed facts, I find that the attempted appraisement embodied in the second return of value by the appraiser of the merchandise covered by each of these appeals for reappraisement was illegal, null, and void, and that the appraiser’s original return of value in each case, as reported by him to the collector of customs, constituted his appraisal of the merchandise pursuant to section 500 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. § 1500), and was final and conclusive in the absence of any appeal pursuant to section 501 of said act (19 U. S. C. § 1501).

Judgment will be entered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gimbel Bros., Inc. v. United States, 24 Cust. Ct. 566, 1950 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2066 (cusc 1950).

24 Cust. Ct. 566 (Gimbel Bros., Inc. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gothic Watch Co. v. United States
19 Cust. Ct. 309 (U.S. Customs Court, 1947)
United States v. Gothic Watch Co.
23 Cust. Ct. 235 (U.S. Customs Court, 1949)