Gilmore v. State

668 So. 2d 1092, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 2046, 1996 WL 91548
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 5, 1996·No. No. 95-830·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s convictions and sentences for burglary with assault or battery, robbery, possession of cocaine, possession of drug paraphernalia and obstructing an officer without violence. We reverse, however, the trial court’s order of restitution because it was entered without notice or a hearing. Dubois v. State, 650 So.2d 228 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995); Rhoden v. State, 622 So.2d 122 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998); Harris v. State, 593 So.2d 1169 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992). The state properly concedes error in the trial court’s imposition of restitution.

Accordingly, we reverse and remand for the trial court to hold a restitution hearing. The judgment and sentence are, in all other respects, affirmed.

JOANOS, BENTON and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gilmore v. State, 668 So. 2d 1092, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 2046, 1996 WL 91548 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

668 So. 2d 1092 (Gilmore v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Chaney v. State
918 A.2d 506 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2007)
Bridgewater v. State
668 So. 2d 1092 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)