Gilmore v. State

724 So. 2d 647, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 108, 1999 WL 4827
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 8, 1999
DocketNo. 97-02083
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 724 So. 2d 647 (Gilmore v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gilmore v. State, 724 So. 2d 647, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 108, 1999 WL 4827 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Timmy Lee Gilmore appeals the sentences imposed following the violations of his community control. We reverse the sentences.

Gilmore pled guilty to three counts of attempted sexual battery and one count of lewd and lascivious conduct and was placed on community control. He committed multiple violations of his community control. The tri[648]*648al court revoked Gilmore’s community control and sentenced him to concurrent terms of thirty years in prison for each of the attempted sexual battery counts and fifteen years in prison for the lewd and lascivious act. Gilmore appeals only the sentences.

When there are multiple violations, the sentences may be increased one cell or guidelines range for each violation. See Williams v. State, 594 So.2d 273 (Fla.1992). However, the term “multiple violations” refers to successive violations which follow the reinstatement or modification of the community control rather than the violation of several conditions of a single order. See Williams, 594 So.2d at 273 n. 3.

The trial court in this case increased Gilmore’s sentence three cells. This was erroneous because the three violations of community control were not successive violations which followed the reinstatement or modification of Gilmore’s community control. See Williams, 594 So.2d 273; see also, Williams v. State, 720 So.2d 590, 23 Fla. L. Weekly D2323 (Fla. 2d DCA Oct.16, 1998).

Accordingly, we vacate Gilmore’s sentences and remand for resentencing with a corrected scoresheet which reflects only a single violation of community control.

Reversed and remanded.

THREADGILL, A.C.J., and NORTHCUTT and GREEN, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rowan v. State
791 So. 2d 40 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
724 So. 2d 647, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 108, 1999 WL 4827, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gilmore-v-state-fladistctapp-1999.