Gilliam v. State
787 So. 2d 976, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 9123, 2001 WL 726260
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Gilliam v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 857 So. 2d 1006 →
Opinion
We affirm appellant’s conviction, but in accordance with the supreme court’s decision in State v. Huggins, 26 Fla. L. Weekly S174, - So.2d -, 2001 WL 278107 (Fla. March 22, 2001), we vacate appellant’s sentence and remand for resentenc-[977]*977ing. We do not address appellant’s second issue, which was not preserved for review.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gilliam v. State, 787 So. 2d 976, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 9123, 2001 WL 726260 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).
787 So. 2d 976 (Gilliam v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Huggins
802 So. 2d 276 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2001)