Gilliam v. State
787 So. 2d 976, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 9123, 2001 WL 726260
This text of 787 So. 2d 976 (Gilliam v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Gilliam v. State, 787 So. 2d 976, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 9123, 2001 WL 726260 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).
Opinion
We affirm appellant’s conviction, but in accordance with the supreme court’s decision in State v. Huggins, 26 Fla. L. Weekly S174, - So.2d -, 2001 WL 278107 (Fla. March 22, 2001), we vacate appellant’s sentence and remand for resentenc-[977]*977ing. We do not address appellant’s second issue, which was not preserved for review.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Huggins
802 So. 2d 276 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2001)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
787 So. 2d 976, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 9123, 2001 WL 726260, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gilliam-v-state-fladistctapp-2001.