Gillespie v. . Weinberg
This text of 42 N.E. 676 (Gillespie v. . Weinberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We do not assent to the opinion of the trial court that the defendants are not entitled to use the alley in question to cart goods to and from their premises. We think the alley may be used for the passage of teams and vehicles as well as for foot travelers, so far as is necessary to the reasonable and proper use and enjoyment of the defendants’ premises, although their uses and occupancy may have been changed. We so held in Arnold v. Fee (148 N. Y. 214). But as the judgment in no way restrains the defendants from passing and repassing to and from their premises, it should be affirmed.
The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
42 N.E. 676, 148 N.Y. 238, 2 E.H. Smith 238, 1896 N.Y. LEXIS 546, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gillespie-v-weinberg-ny-1896.