Home/Michigan Supreme Court/Gillespie v. RUSSELL FILTRATION, INC.

Gillespie v. RUSSELL FILTRATION, INC.

729 N.W.2d 846, 477 Mich. 1110
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Gillespie v. RUSSELL FILTRATION, INC.. Read the opinion of the Court — 477 Mich. 865 →
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided April 24, 2007·No. 131457·Published

Opinion

729 N.W.2d 846 (2007)

James GILLESPIE, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
RUSSELL FILTRATION, INC., and Randal J. Armstrong, Defendants-Appellants.

Docket No. 131457. COA No. 268263.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

April 24, 2007.

By order of September 26, 2006, this case was remanded to the Court of Appeals for an explanation of the conclusion that the defendants' application for leave to appeal grossly disregarded the requirements of a fair presentation of the issues to the court. On March 8, 2007, the Court of Appeals issued an opinion stating reasons for the sanctions it imposed pursuant to MCR 7.216(C)(1)(b). On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 5, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is again considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gillespie v. RUSSELL FILTRATION, INC., 729 N.W.2d 846, 477 Mich. 1110 (Mich. 2007).

729 N.W.2d 846 (Gillespie v. RUSSELL FILTRATION, INC.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.