Gillespie v. RUSSELL FILTRATION, INC.
This text of 721 N.W.2d 217 (Gillespie v. RUSSELL FILTRATION, INC.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
James GILLESPIE, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
RUSSELL FILTRATION, INC., and Randal J. Armstrong, Defendants-Appellants.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 5, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for an explanation of the conclusion that the defendants' application for leave to appeal grossly disregarded the requirements of a fair presentation of the issues to the court.
We retain jurisdiction.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
721 N.W.2d 217, 477 Mich. 865, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gillespie-v-russell-filtration-inc-mich-2006.