Gillespie v. RUSSELL FILTRATION, INC.
721 N.W.2d 217, 477 Mich. 865
Opinion
James GILLESPIE, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
RUSSELL FILTRATION, INC., and Randal J. Armstrong, Defendants-Appellants.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 5, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for an explanation of the conclusion that the defendants' application for leave to appeal grossly disregarded the requirements of a fair presentation of the issues to the court.
We retain jurisdiction.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gillespie v. RUSSELL FILTRATION, INC., 721 N.W.2d 217, 477 Mich. 865 (Mich. 2006).
721 N.W.2d 217 (Gillespie v. RUSSELL FILTRATION, INC.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. WARTLEY
721 N.W.2d 217 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2006)