Gillard v. AIG INSURANCE COMPANY

990 A.2d 1147, 605 Pa. 412, 2010 Pa. LEXIS 458
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided March 16, 2010·No. 72 EAL 2008·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 16th day of March, 2010, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issues, paraphrased for clarity, are:

a. Whether the attorney-client privilege applies to communications from the attorney to the client.
b. Whether the Superior Court erred in holding the attorney-client privilege applies only to confidential communications from the client to the attorney, pursuant to Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company v. Fleming, 924 A.2d 1259 (Pa.Super.2007).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gillard v. AIG INSURANCE COMPANY, 990 A.2d 1147, 605 Pa. 412, 2010 Pa. LEXIS 458 (Pa. 2010).

990 A.2d 1147 (Gillard v. AIG INSURANCE COMPANY) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lower Perkiomen Valley Regional Sewer Auth. v. Lower Providence Twp.
21 Pa. D. & C.5th 449 (Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas, 2011)