Gillard-Holmes v. Persigo

225 A.D.2d 519, 639 N.Y.2d 90
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 4, 1996
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 225 A.D.2d 519 (Gillard-Holmes v. Persigo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gillard-Holmes v. Persigo, 225 A.D.2d 519, 639 N.Y.2d 90 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

The plaintiffs’ appeal taken as of right from the order dated November 9, 1994, is dismissed since no appeal lies from an order entered upon the default of the appealing party (see, Katz v Katz, 68 AD2d 536). In addition, the order is not appealable as of right as it determined a motion that was not made on notice (see, CPLR 5701 [b]).

The appeal from the order dated December 14, 1994, is also dismissed. The order dated November 9, 1994, dismissed the plaintiffs’ complaint "without prejudice”. The plaintiffs subsequently commenced other actions arising out of the same facts and seeking the same relief in the Supreme Court, Nassau County. Thus, the appeal from the order dated December 14, 1994, is dismissed as academic. Balletta, J. P., O’Brien, Ritter, Pizzuto and Altman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gillard-Holmes v. Persico
225 A.D.2d 519 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
225 A.D.2d 519, 639 N.Y.2d 90, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gillard-holmes-v-persigo-nyappdiv-1996.