Gillard-Holmes v. Persico
225 A.D.2d 519, 638 N.Y.2d 926, 638 N.Y.S.2d 926, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1955
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 4, 1996·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
[520]*520Upon the papers filed in support of the motion, the papers filed in opposition thereto, and upon the submission of the appeals, it is
Ordered that the motion is denied as academic (see, Gillard-Holmes v Persico, 225 AD2d 519 [decided herewith]). Balletta, J. P., O’Brien, Ritter, Pizzuto and Altman, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gillard-Holmes v. Persico, 225 A.D.2d 519, 638 N.Y.2d 926, 638 N.Y.S.2d 926, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1955 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).
225 A.D.2d 519 (Gillard-Holmes v. Persico) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re Carmen P.
32 A.D.3d 951 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Paoli v. Paoli
29 A.D.3d 804 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Blumes v. Madar
21 A.D.3d 518 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)