Gill v. Bk Bryant Ave. HDFC., Inc.

2023 NY Slip Op 05312
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 19, 2023
DocketIndex No. 33960/18E Appeal No. 844 Case No. 2023-01352
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 2023 NY Slip Op 05312 (Gill v. Bk Bryant Ave. HDFC., Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gill v. Bk Bryant Ave. HDFC., Inc., 2023 NY Slip Op 05312 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2023).

Opinion

Gill v Bk Bryant Ave. HDFC., Inc. (2023 NY Slip Op 05312)
Gill v Bk Bryant Ave. HDFC., Inc.
2023 NY Slip Op 05312
Decided on October 19, 2023
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided and Entered: October 19, 2023
Before: Kapnick, J.P., Singh, Friedman, González, Shulman, JJ.

Index No. 33960/18E Appeal No. 844 Case No. 2023-01352

[*1]Maria Gill, Plaintiff-Respondent,

v

Bk Bryant Avenue HDFC., Inc., et al., Defendants-Appellants.


Rebore, Thorpe & Pisarello, P.C., Farmingdale (Michelle S. Russo of counsel), for appellants.

Kenneth J. Gorman, New York, for respondent.



Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Alison Y. Tuit, J.), entered January 25, 2023, which denied defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

In this action in which plaintiff slipped and fell on the exterior staircase of her apartment building as a result of snow and ice, she raised an issue of fact as to whether her accident occurred while a storm was in progress or whether there was a significant lull in the storm by submitting the affidavit of her experts, who found that the last measurable snowfall occurred approximately six hours prior to the accident (see Pipero v New York City Tr. Auth., 69 AD3d 493, 493 [1st Dept 2010]; Powell v MLG Hillside Assoc., 290 AD2d 345, 346 [1st Dept 2002]). Plaintiff also raised an issue of fact as to whether defendants' snow removal the night before her accident created or exacerbated the slippery condition (see Genen v Metro-North Commuter R.R., 261 AD2d 211, 212 [1st Dept 1999]).

We have considered defendants' remaining arguments and find them unavailing.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: October 19, 2023



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gill v. Bk Bryant Ave. HDFC., Inc.
2023 NY Slip Op 05312 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2023)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2023 NY Slip Op 05312, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gill-v-bk-bryant-ave-hdfc-inc-nyappdiv-2023.