Gilbert v. State
755 So. 2d 197, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 4566, 2000 WL 390242
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 19, 2000·No. No. 3D98-1133·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Defendant appeals from judgments of conviction and sentences for sexual offenses he committed against his daughter. This is the third sentencing appeal. See Gilbert v. State, 706 So.2d 135 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998) (Gilbert II); Gilbert v. State, 680 So.2d 1132 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996) (Gilbert I). We find no error, as defendant was sentenced within the guidelines as mandated by Gilbert II. The remaining points are without merit, and we affirm the multiple convictions and sentences.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gilbert v. State, 755 So. 2d 197, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 4566, 2000 WL 390242 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).
755 So. 2d 197 (Gilbert v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Gilbert v. State
838 So. 2d 623 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)