Gilbert v. State

706 So. 2d 135, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 2127, 1998 WL 88275
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 4, 1998·No. No. 97-1203·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

After we remanded this case for resentenc-ing under the 1994 guidelines in Gilbert v. State, 680 So.2d 1132 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996), the trial judge imposed a departure sentence on grounds of (a) heightened premeditation, State v. Obojes, 604 So.2d 474 (Fla.1992), and (b) vulnerability due to age of the victim, § 921.0016(3)0), Fla. Stat. (1996). We find that the evidence supports neither of these grounds for departure. See Marcott v. State, 650 So.2d 977 (Fla.1995); Green v. State, 662 So.2d 748 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996).

Accordingly, the sentence under review is reversed and the cause remanded with directions to impose a guidelines sentence.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gilbert v. State, 706 So. 2d 135, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 2127, 1998 WL 88275 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

706 So. 2d 135 (Gilbert v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gilbert v. State
755 So. 2d 197 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)