Gilbert v. State

706 So. 2d 135, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 2127, 1998 WL 88275
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 4, 1998
DocketNo. 97-1203
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 706 So. 2d 135 (Gilbert v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gilbert v. State, 706 So. 2d 135, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 2127, 1998 WL 88275 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

After we remanded this case for resentenc-ing under the 1994 guidelines in Gilbert v. State, 680 So.2d 1132 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996), the trial judge imposed a departure sentence on grounds of (a) heightened premeditation, State v. Obojes, 604 So.2d 474 (Fla.1992), and (b) vulnerability due to age of the victim, § 921.0016(3)0), Fla. Stat. (1996). We find that the evidence supports neither of these grounds for departure. See Marcott v. State, 650 So.2d 977 (Fla.1995); Green v. State, 662 So.2d 748 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996).

Accordingly, the sentence under review is reversed and the cause remanded with directions to impose a guidelines sentence.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gilbert v. State
755 So. 2d 197 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
706 So. 2d 135, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 2127, 1998 WL 88275, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gilbert-v-state-fladistctapp-1998.