Gilbert v. State

8 So. 2d 924, 150 Fla. 835, 1942 Fla. LEXIS 1088
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Gilbert v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 148 Fla. 293
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided June 19, 1942·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Appeal brings for review judgment of conviction of grand larceny.

We have carefully examined the transcript of the record in light of the briefs and find no reversible error reflected therein.

*836 The questions presented by the appellant have been heretofore considered by us in other cases and determined adversely to the contentions of this appellant. Therefore, no useful purpose may be served by promulgating an opinion restating what we hold to be the correct legal conclusions under such conditions.

The judgment should be affirmed.

So ordered.

BROWN, C. J., WHITFIELD, BUFORD and ADAMS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gilbert v. State, 8 So. 2d 924, 150 Fla. 835, 1942 Fla. LEXIS 1088 (Fla. 1942).

8 So. 2d 924 (Gilbert v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.