Gilbert v. Rorick
186 N.E. 90, 125 Ohio St. 636, 125 Ohio St. (N.S.) 636, 1932 Ohio LEXIS 270
This text of 186 N.E. 90 (Gilbert v. Rorick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Gilbert v. Rorick, 186 N.E. 90, 125 Ohio St. 636, 125 Ohio St. (N.S.) 636, 1932 Ohio LEXIS 270 (Ohio 1932).
Opinion
It is ordered and adjudged by this Court that the judgment of the said Court of Appeals be, and the same is hereby, affirmed by virtue of Buie XIX of this Court, the Court finding that the judgment of the Court of Appeals, reversing that of the common pleas, was based, at least partly, on the ground that the judgment was not sustained by sufficient evidence.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Corman Aircraft Corp. v. Weihmiller
78 F.2d 241 (Seventh Circuit, 1935)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
186 N.E. 90, 125 Ohio St. 636, 125 Ohio St. (N.S.) 636, 1932 Ohio LEXIS 270, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gilbert-v-rorick-ohio-1932.