Gilbert v. Ferry

137 F. App'x 870
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided June 24, 2005·No. No. 04-1207·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

ORDER

Plaintiffs have filed a motion to suspend the rules, expedite the appeal filed in Fieger v. Ferry, No. 05-1295, consolidate that case with the instant appeal, vacate the district court judgment in that case and the panel decision in Gilbert v. Ferry, 401 F.3d 411 (6th Cir.2005), remand both cases to the district court for reconsideration in light of Exxon Mobil Corporation v. Saudi Basic Industries Corporation, — U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 1517 161 L.Ed.2d 454 (2005), March 30, 2005, and remand both cases with instructions to re-open discovery so Plaintiffs-Appellants may produce evidence that one or more of the exceptions to Younger abstention apply to Gilbert and Fieger.

The motion to consolidate the appeal filed in Fieger with the instant appeal and to remand the consolidated cases is denied in light of our decision this day in Gilbert.

The motion to remand Fieger for further discovery and to expedite the appeal are denied without prejudice and may be raised before the panel assigned to that appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gilbert v. Ferry, 137 F. App'x 870 (6th Cir. 2005).

137 F. App'x 870 (Gilbert v. Ferry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Wilson Dominguez
513 F. App'x 458 (Sixth Circuit, 2013)
United States v. Blackie
Sixth Circuit, 2008
United States v. Reid
206 F. App'x 493 (Sixth Circuit, 2006)