Gil v. Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Gil v. Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co.

39 A.D.3d 703, 832 N.Y.S.2d 455

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 17, 2007·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants third-party plaintiffs appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (David Schmidt, J.), dated June 9, 2005, as denied those branches of its motion which were for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and for summary judgment on its third-party cause of action for contractual indemnification.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, with costs, as the order was superseded by an order of the same court dated December 23, 2005, made upon reargument (see Gil v Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co., 39 AD3d 703 [2007] [decided herewith]). Schmidt, J.P., Mastro, Carni and Dickerson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants third-party plaintiffs appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (David Schmidt, J.), dated June 9, 2005, as denied those branches of its motion which were for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and for summary judgment on its third-party cause of action for contractual indemnification.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, with costs, as the order was superseded by an order of the same court dated December 23, 2005, made upon reargument (see Gil v Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co., 39 AD3d 703 [2007] [decided herewith]). Schmidt, J.P., Mastro, Carni and Dickerson, JJ., concur.

Gil v. Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co., 39 A.D.3d 703, 832 N.Y.S.2d 455 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

39 A.D.3d 703 (Gil v. Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related