Gibson v. State

956 So. 2d 557, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 8170, 2007 WL 1514234
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Gibson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 968 So. 2d 631
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 25, 2007·No. No. 5D05-3289·Published

Opinion

THOMPSON, J.

AFFIRMED. See Battle v. State, 911 So.2d 85, 89 (Fla.2005) (noting fundamental error is that which reaches down into the validity of the trial itself such that a guilty verdict could not have been obtained without the assistance of the alleged error); McCray v. State, 416 So.2d 804, 806 (Fla.1982) (stating “the fact that the defendant might have a better chance of acquittal or a strategic advantage if tried separately does not establish the right to a severance”).

ORFINGER and TORPY, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gibson v. State, 956 So. 2d 557, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 8170, 2007 WL 1514234 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

956 So. 2d 557 (Gibson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McCray v. State
416 So. 2d 804 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1982)
Battle v. State
911 So. 2d 85 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2005)