Gibson v. State
920 So. 2d 719, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 2511, 2006 WL 437509
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 8, 2006·No. No. 4D05-3264·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Edward Gibson appeals the striking of his rule 3.850 motion for post-conviction relief. The circuit court struck the motion because an appeal from the denial of Gibson’s unrelated rule 3.800(a) motion was pending with this court. However, the trial court had jurisdiction to entertain the unrelated rule 3.850 motion. See Newberry v. State, 827 So.2d 387 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002); Norman v. State, 739 So.2d 1258 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999). We reverse and remand to the circuit court to conduct further proceedings on the motion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gibson v. State, 920 So. 2d 719, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 2511, 2006 WL 437509 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).
920 So. 2d 719 (Gibson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Grace v. State
920 So. 2d 719 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)