Gibson v. State
810 So. 2d 1008, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 2070, 2002 WL 272275
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 27, 2002·No. No. 4D02-90·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
We affirm Appellant’s claim that Hale v. State, 630 So.2d 521 (Fla.1993), entitles him to relief. This point is insufficiently pled. This affirmance is without prejudice to any right Appellant might have to file a facially sufficient rule 3.800(a) motion indicating where and how the record demonstrates that he is entitled to relief. See Holsworth v. State, 522 So.2d 348 (Fla.1988).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gibson v. State, 810 So. 2d 1008, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 2070, 2002 WL 272275 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).
810 So. 2d 1008 (Gibson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Aponte v. State
810 So. 2d 1008 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)