Gibson v. State

767 So. 2d 623, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 11895, 2000 WL 1345020
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Gibson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 721 So. 2d 363
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 20, 2000·No. No. 4D99-1147·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The Defendant appeals his conviction for robbery and his fifteen-year sentence as a prison releasee reoffender. The Defendant raises four points on appeal. With regard to the Defendant’s argument that Pompano Beach police officers lacked authority to arrest him outside their jurisdiction because the officers were not in fresh pursuit, we disagree and affirm the trial court’s denial of the Defendant’s motion to suppress. See Porter v. State, 765 So.2d 76 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000). The Defendant’s remaining arguments are without merit. Accordingly, we affirm the Defendant’s conviction and sentence.

AFFIRMED.

WARNER, C.J., GUNTHER and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gibson v. State, 767 So. 2d 623, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 11895, 2000 WL 1345020 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

767 So. 2d 623 (Gibson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Porter v. State
765 So. 2d 76 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)