Gibson v. State

601 So. 2d 1345, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 8860, 1992 WL 183984
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Gibson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 619 So. 2d 31
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 5, 1992·No. No. 90-1706·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Samuel Gibson appeals his convictions and sentences for armed burglary of a dwelling, grand theft, possession of a firearm by a convicted felon and carrying a concealed weapon. We affirm his convictions and sentences with the exception of the enhancement portion of his sentence, which we reverse. The trial court failed to make the findings mandated by section 775.084(1)(a)3 and 4, Florida Statutes (1989). See Van Bryant v. State, 602 So.2d 582 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992). On remand, the trial court may sentence appellant as a habitual offender upon making the findings required by section 775.-084(1)(a).

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART and REMANDED.

DELL and GUNTHER, JJ., and OWEN, WILLIAM C., Jr., Senior Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gibson v. State, 601 So. 2d 1345, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 8860, 1992 WL 183984 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

601 So. 2d 1345 (Gibson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Van Bryant v. State
602 So. 2d 582 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)