Gibson v. State

565 So. 2d 402, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 6246, 1990 WL 115512
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 13, 1990
DocketNo. 89-1901
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 565 So. 2d 402 (Gibson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gibson v. State, 565 So. 2d 402, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 6246, 1990 WL 115512 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinions

ZEHMER, Judge.

We affirm the trial court’s denial of the motion to suppress as the evidence supports a finding that the challenged identification was reliable and without error.

The trial court erred, however, in imposing judgment of conviction for both sale of cocaine and possession of cocaine with intent to sell in violation of section 893.-13(l)(a), Florida Statutes (1987), under the circumstances of this case because the elements of the crime of sale of cocaine subsume the elements of the crime of possession of cocaine with intent to sell. State v. McCloud, 559 So.2d 1305 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990). Our construction of section 893.-13(l)(a) to the effect that sale and possession with intent to sell is but one offense is not affected by the 1988 amendment to section 775.021, Florida Statutes, adding subsection 4(b).1 Wheeler v. State, 549 So.2d 687 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989) (en banc). Accordingly, we affirm the conviction imposed on the sale count and vacate the conviction imposed on the possession count. For purposes of review by the supreme court, we certify the following question as being one of great public importance:

WHEN A DOUBLE JEOPARDY VIOLATION IS ALLEGED BASED ON THE CRIMES OF SALE AND POSSESSION (OR POSSESSION WITH INTENT TO SELL) OF THE SAME QUANTUM OF CONTRABAND IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 893.13(1)(A) AND THE CRIMES OCCURRED AFTER THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF SECTION 775.021, FLORIDA STATUTES (SUPP. 1988), IS IT UNLAWFUL TO CONVICT AND SENTENCE FOR BOTH CRIMES?

Compare V.A.A. v. State, 561 So.2d 314 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990); State v. McCloud, 559 So.2d 1305 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990).

SMITH, J., concurs. BOOTH, J., concurs in part and dissents in part, with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Holmes v. State
575 So. 2d 332 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
565 So. 2d 402, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 6246, 1990 WL 115512, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gibson-v-state-fladistctapp-1990.